![]() Strawberries are mainly water and do not put on weight. It is amazing that five or six strawberries has the same filling the stomach effect as a slice of bread. My diet has changed and probably for the better. I hope so as I would not go on O****** again unless I simply *had* to. The question is can I maintain this low 90 Kgs weight. I weighed in at 104 Kg in October, last week at the doctors surgery I tipped the scales at 91 Kg. And then I felt confident enough to venture into town. I stuck with the medication for six months and it was another month before my body had returned to normal. I felt that I could go nowhere, not to the shops, no visiting. The diarrhea lasted for many weeks thus limiting my movement. It almost amounted to that on that night. As I use crutches to move around at night time, I thought that I would have to sleep on the throne. The diarrhea was so bad one night that I stopped counting after ten visits to the bathroom. This left me feeling drained, often for days on end. Not so, the nausea was replaced by diarrhea which was frequent and, for want of a better descriptive term, explosive. Some weeks went by without any side effects leading me to think I had weathered the storm. The side effects of O****** were, in my case, very extreme and difficult to live with. Very soon my trousers was many sizes too big for me, a bit like the pictures of extreme weight loss that 'shows' how effective such and such a diet is.īut, and there is a big but. ![]() My main problem foods were milk, bread and potatoes. I soon discovered that I had been eating way too much food for my needs and I started to lose weight. O****** works be suppressing your appetite, this it does in spades. My wonderful wife did the injecting, which to be honest, was almost painless and nothing to worry about. It comes in a pen that injects a measured dose about two mm into the skin. O****** is expensive, and it is not allowed to claim for it on the Drugs Refund Scheme. ![]() As my mobility is limited, he suggested that I use a product called O******* which he said would do that job if I could stick with it for six months. Actually he said I should lose two stone. Last October, a consultant that was referred to told me that it would be better if I lost some weight. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() This is a no-frills, entry-level (or close to it) Dolby Digital/DTS model from 2003. With a little patience while monitoring For Sale ads on my local Craigslist, I managed to pick up a pair of used Marantz SR4400s for well below $100 each. (If using multiple secondary receivers, I recommend that they be identical to each other.) Any receiver that has, at a minimum, Dolby ProLogic II processing will do. Although your primary A/V receiver must be a Dolby Atmos (or DTS:X) model capable of decoding 7.1.4 channels of sound from a Blu-ray or UHD immersive audio soundtrack, the secondary receivers don’t need to be nearly as fancy. With his permission, I’m just trying to explain it here.įor as perhaps ridiculously complicated as they may be to install, one of the saving graces of these experiments is that they can be assembled relatively inexpensively. Credit for that goes to Scott Simonian and others at AVSForum who helped him work it out. The silly Zatmos and Scatmos nicknames can be more formally grouped under the heading of “Dolby Atmos Extended.” I want to be clear here that I did not develop the Scatmos process. Eventually, I knew that if I was going to do this, I needed to do it right. However, in recent months, my attitude changed and I grew less satisfied with the Zatmos configuration. I felt that the results I had with Zatmos were good enough to get me most of the way there, and I had a certain amount of egotistical pride that I’d figured out a way to do it with just one extra receiver rather than two. The complexity of installing, connecting and configuring three A/V receivers seemed like overkill to me. Over at AVSForum, a member named Scott Simonian had gone even further to use a total of three A/V receivers in unison to create a 7.1.6 configuration (affectionately known as “Scatmos”) more accurate to the intentions of the original Dolby Atmos sound mixers.įor a while, I decided not to go that far. See Also The Best VPN Server Countries to Connect Through "Unfair and irresponsible" claim? Pinoy vlogger sa South Korea, inimbestigahan ang "Hermes snub" kay Sharon Cuneta Hocus Pocus 2 Ver Películas Online Gratis Castellano 20 mejores campañas en redes socialesĮven at the time, I was not the only person experimenting with this, and I knew that my Zatmos system was not as ideal as I would have liked it. I needed to find a way to jury-rig a similar effect for a fraction of the cost. ![]() Unfortunately, the asking price for that Trinnov processor is absurdly beyond my budget. The better solution is to install additional speakers in the center between the other height channels (Top Middle position). Those speakers are now fixed in place with wiring through the walls and ceiling, and I can’t move them without remodeling the room. This issue is compounded by the fact that the locations where I had installed speakers when I built the home theater (before immersive audio was a concern I gave any thought to) were less than ideal for Atmos. That, combined with a low ceiling, makes it difficult for just four speakers (two in the front of the room and two in the back) to image a sound above my head convincingly. My own home theater is a long room with a lot of space behind my seats. ![]() Nonetheless, for some of us, a limit of four height channels isn’t enough to fill the top of the room with sound. ![]() |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |